Thanks for this - been scratching my head for many an hour trying to figure this out.
Link to hi res version seems broken?
http://a5.video3.blip.tv/0410011066736/Ciderpunx-UsingGIMPToMakeADistressedFont651.mp4?brs=1528&bri=2.5
Oldak
nil != true
Thanks for this - been scratching my head for many an hour trying to figure this out.
Link to hi res version seems broken?
http://a5.video3.blip.tv/0410011066736/Ciderpunx-UsingGIMPToMakeADistressedFont651.mp4?brs=1528&bri=2.5
I just realised it'd be trivial to factor the archive code out and reuse it on the cover ages themselves to show some recent posts on that subject. Code reuse FTW.
Hey Todd,
Yeh, there is a twitter search API. If you wanted an RSS feed of #OWS results you'd do something like this:
http://search.twitter.com/search.rss?q=OWS. Just add your terms after the q=. The API is documented over ondev.twitter.com.
This is so helpful. Thank you so much.
Thanks for doing this. Is there an api for turning twitter searches into rss feeds as well? I used to be able to create persistent searches for what people were tweeting about and turn them into rss feeds but not any longer. That is infinitely more valueable to me than what one person is tweeting...
Thank you so much for this!!!! I use Outlook at home and the office and have 99% of all my tweets set up as RSS. When they removed the link for the RSS feed recently (i kept my account in the old version to keep the rss feed link until they forced the change on me) i was furious as I couldn't add any new users.
I still can't get the remote_browser plugin to work correctly. I know you changed the order around, but did you do anything else? like set the uid/gid back to the default value?
@Tim
heh I've been playing around with CSS3 text shadow, that's what is making you feel like you've been drinking!
It looks OK from here and from the various machines on which I have tested, but maybe your monitor renders differently. Anyhow in the interests of legibility I switched it back to normal. I might switch it back again in the future of course...
Thanks for the info, but wtf is up with the font in your comment boxes. It's like I have double vision.
IMO, you are incorrect in stating "nil is neither true nor false". nil is false. You seem to be determining that it is not false due to "nil or not nil" returning false. "not nil" evaluates to "nil", so you are really saying that "nil or nil", both of which being false, evaluate to false.